Talk:M-16A & M-16A2

Revision as of 17:53, 22 October 2020 by imported>Terran Ghost
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Giving FN FAL "very reliable" while slandering the M16A2 with "unreliable"? What a piece of bullshit? Considering that doing the actual dust test see the "vaunted" FN FAL fail where the AR-15/M16 continue to work. Part of that owes to having ejection port cover, of course, but still. The AR deserve at least "standard". Terran Ghost (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Return to "M-16A & M-16A2" page.